NEWS
Legal knowledge in practice
A guide to the world of law for anyone looking for clear and straightforward legal information

The Supreme Court Just Refined the Rules of the Game for Landlords' Retention Law
According to the Supreme Court (26 Cdo 2057/2025), § 2234 o.z. must be interpreted as meaning that the lessor may retain only things owned by the lessee. No vendor refrigerators, no leasing machines, no third party goods.
Grazie! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Supreme Court: A parent's stay in a medical facility with a hospitalized child has its limits
The Supreme Court in its decision of 17.9.2025, sp. zn. 25 Cdo 2087/2024 stated that the right of a parent to stay with a hospitalized child is not absolute. In this case, it was a mother who wanted to spend the night in intensive care with her month-old son. The paramedics allowed her to stay awake at the bedside, but not to sleep, because the ward was not spatially or technically adapted for this. The lawsuit for apology and compensation was dismissed by the courts.

Specifics of the termination of the sublease contract of an apartment through the lens of the Supreme Court jurisprudence
The Civil Code (hereinafter referred to as the “OZ”) regulates the institution of subletting in two places, in the general provisions on rent (§ 2215 and § 2216) and in the subsection on the special provisions on the rent of an apartment and house (§ 2274-2278).

Objective responsibility of the vehicle operator
Objective liability of the vehicle operator is an important institution of administrative law, which serves to effectively punish road traffic violations, especially in cases where it is not possible to identify the specific offender. This legal institute was introduced by an amendment to Act No. 361/2000 Coll., on Traffic on Road Roads (hereinafter referred to as the “Act on Traffic on Road Roads”), effective from 19 January 2013.

Liability of the director for the company's public debt: When does the court decide and when does the tax administrator decide?
In a recent decision (27 Cdo 1993/2023), the Supreme Court clarified an important question: can a tax administrator demand payment of a public debt — such as a fine — directly from a company executive if he has breached his duty of care to a proper manager?

Moderation of a contractual penalty in the context of case law
The Institute of Contractual Penalty is an important instrument in civil law for the consolidation of obligations. Its function is primarily preventive, punitive and hedging, the purpose of which is to motivate the debtor to fulfill the obligation, while at the same time providing the creditor with the assurance of quick and relatively easy satisfaction in the event of a breach of obligation. At the same time, however, there is a danger of excessive contractual penalties, which would lead to a disproportionate burden on the debtor. Therefore, the legislator in Section 2051 of the Civil Code (hereinafter referred to as “OZ”) enshrined the possibility of moderation of the contractual penalty.
CASES
Our successful legal projects
Comprehensive solution of legal challenges for different business entities
I would like to thank the team of AK Řezníček & Co., namely JUDr. David Řezníček and Mgr. Alena Hejné for legal representation. Total professionalism, quick understanding and evaluation of the situation, sensitive and at the same time forceful conduct of negotiations with the counterparty. The ability to listen, professional expertise, straightforwardness and rationality are strong qualities of the aforementioned. Moreover, the result of our cooperation can be described as a definite success!
AK Řezníček & Co. Ltd., helps us resolve the dispute with the insurance company and we can already highly recommend the services of this AK. Fast, factual and friendly communication with a professional approach and at the same time high expertise and quality of services offered.
I can highly recommend AK Reznicek & Co. services. The whole team is doing a flawless job, but I have to highlight the great cooperation with Mgr. Jakub Sumhrada. Professional approach, great legal expertise. Maestro je objavljena, he tried to suggest more ways, but he always summed up the situation and the procedure he recommended in a completely realistic way. In the end, everything turned out to my satisfaction and I am very happy that I chose AK to represent. I can only recommend.
Zastoupení a pomoc advokátní kanceláří Řezníček ze své pozice mohu doporučit. Jejich přístup je na velmi vysoké úrovni a kvalitě. V poslední době jsem spolupracoval s panem Magistrem Lukášem Beerem. Domluva, služby a zastoupení na jedničku. V dnešní době, kdy se domoci skutečně práva a spravedlnosti není úplně snadné, je potřeba silné zastoupení. A to Advokátní kancelář Řezníček & Co splňuje
The law firm and specifically Mr Mgr. I can only recommend Souhrad! I was extremely satisfied with your services. Friendliness, humanity, willingness and professionalism. I will recommend it further. Thank you very much again!
We support
Do you need legal advice?
We are ready to help you with any legal issue. Do not hesitate to contact us for a non-binding consultation.






