The Supreme Court Just Refined the Rules of the Game for Landlords' Retention Law
According to the Supreme Court (26 Cdo 2057/2025), § 2234 o.z. must be interpreted as meaning that the lessor may retain only things owned by the lessee. No vendor refrigerators, no leasing machines, no third party goods.
The landlord withheld the fridges in the rented premises due to the rent owed. The hook? The fridges belonged to a third party -- and were duly marked with service labels with owner details. According to the Supreme Court (26 Cdo 2057/2025) Paragraph 2234 et seq. must be interpreted as meaning that the lessor may retain only things owned by the lessee. No vendor refrigerators, no leasing machines, no third party goods. Check ownership relationships before you as a landlord withhold anything. Service labels, lease agreements, delivery notes -- all of these can mean you're withholding someone else's property.
Do you need legal advice?
We are ready to help you with any legal issue. Do not hesitate to contact us for a non-binding consultation.
Podobné
Relationship between the main thing and its accessories
it is necessary, from the point of view of law, to differentiate separately from liability for defects of the purchased item, the defects of the main thing and the defects of its accessories, since, fundamentally, the main thing does not share the fate of its accessories. Thus, a defect in the accessories of a mobile phone (headphones, charging adapter) does not entitle you to withdraw from the purchase contract even in relation to the main thing (mobile phone), which in only one case manifested a defect, which was eliminated by repair, and then no further defect appeared on it. (Judgment of the Supreme Court of 30 September 2025, sp. n. 33 Cdo 2225/2023)
As of 17 December 2025, the Register of beneficial owners (ESM) is no longer freely accessible to the public
Data on beneficial owners remain available, in particular, to public authorities and obliged entities under AML regulations (e.g. banks or lawyers) via remote access and to those who demonstrate a legitimate interest. The change was made in response to the case law of the Czech supreme courts, following a ruling by the Court of Justice of the EU, according to which unrestricted public access constituted an unreasonable intrusion on privacy. The obligation of companies to have the beneficial owner duly registered and to update the data on an ongoing basis remains unaffected.