On 29 October 2025, the Constitutional Court issued a finding in the case sp. zn. IV. ÚS 2007/25, in which he again commented on the issue of alternating care
in such a way that there is no constitutional presumption in favor of equal alternating care, when he stressed that the decisive factors should above all be the concrete best interest of the child, his stability, ties and real educational abilities of the parents. However, in the context of the new legislation on child custody, which will enter into force on 1 January 2026 and within which Article 888 of the Civil Code stipulates that the child has the right to equal custody of both parents, just as parents have the right to equal custody of their child, the question is what direction the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court will take in the future.
Do you need legal advice?
We are ready to help you with any legal issue. Do not hesitate to contact us for a non-binding consultation.
Podobné
The Supreme Court Just Refined the Rules of the Game for Landlords' Retention Law
According to the Supreme Court (26 Cdo 2057/2025), § 2234 o.z. must be interpreted as meaning that the lessor may retain only things owned by the lessee. No vendor refrigerators, no leasing machines, no third party goods.
Relationship between the main thing and its accessories
it is necessary, from the point of view of law, to differentiate separately from liability for defects of the purchased item, the defects of the main thing and the defects of its accessories, since, fundamentally, the main thing does not share the fate of its accessories. Thus, a defect in the accessories of a mobile phone (headphones, charging adapter) does not entitle you to withdraw from the purchase contract even in relation to the main thing (mobile phone), which in only one case manifested a defect, which was eliminated by repair, and then no further defect appeared on it. (Judgment of the Supreme Court of 30 September 2025, sp. n. 33 Cdo 2225/2023)